First, we need to give thanks to this new publisher in addition to writers getting the time and effort purchased looking at which manuscript. Your comments was basically very useful to switch our works.
Playing with a large sample away from unmarried Foreign language students (n = 902) which report discusses exactly how private variations in mating orientation changes between those using dating software and non-users. My understanding of the inclusion is that they need to look at the partnership anywhere between mating quick-identity and you may enough time-identity orientations as well as the accessibility relationship programs. In lieu of deciding on facts that may impact the access to matchmaking applications as the analyzed in the past literary works, it assume needs for long-name and quick-term mating direction regarding the means to access matchmaking apps. Especially, they regress decades gender, sexual positioning, together with accessibility matchmaking applications towards the SOI-R, SOI-Decisions, SOI-Thinking, and SOI-Desire, and you will Enough time-name Mating Direction (LTMO). Elizabeth.g., throughout the abstract they state that there have been no differences in the much time-term direction given that a purpose of fool around with/non-play with. I find this problematic of a theoretical point, because they apparently think that matchmaking app play with could affect mating orientation instead of the other way up to. Mating direction while the mentioned having SOI-Roentgen and you will MSOI are methods out of preferences and you may identity functions.
Response: We should thank Reviewer step 1 to your some time effort committed to evaluating the manuscript as well as his/her statements. Your recommendations was basically very beneficial to evolve the performs.
Thank you for the chance to describe this aspect. Our browse purpose should be to verify if Manaus in Brazil women you’ll find differences when considering profiles and non-profiles of dating applications in the mating orientations (short-name and you may long-term). I have tried to get this clearer because of the changing the newest name of one’s manuscript, which is today “Manage younger dating application users and you may non-profiles disagree from inside the mating orientations?”. Within our study, no specific causality (personality programs have fun with or applications have fun with character) is supposed. Having a combination-sectional design, we simply cannot expose any. We have made use of the studies we thought that’s better ideal for response to our research concern. Throughout the Abstract (p. dos, contours 31-33), including, i blogged:
It absolutely was discovered that, whereas matchmaking applications users had increased short-label mating positioning than low-users (more frequent conclusion, high focus, and a lot more positive attitude), there were no differences in the new long-identity direction given that a purpose of play with/non-use.
Right here, along with all throughout the new manuscript, i have demonstrated the outcome because descriptive, not which have one particular presumption regarding explanations and you can effects.
The procedure part provides a great perception of try properties. The new attempt off college students appear to diverge somewhat out-of a broad beginner inhabitants pertaining to the latest ratio from non-heterosexual students. This is not chatted about regarding investigation limits (diminished representativeness).
Response: Thank you so much considerably for your statements and you can suggestion. All of our decide to try is really not the same as that of education achieved various other geographical and you can social contexts, which have a higher ratio of players out of sexual minorities. Yet not, we’re being unsure of regarding the as to why this should be an indicator from lack out of representativeness, whether or not, for certain, we and additionally don’t make sure representativeness of our own try. The new sampling for this analysis is similar otherwise much like the new sampling from earlier in the day studies in the exact same browse classification (look for Dining table below).
